I'm fairly new to the in-mold industry, and I'm curious in learning more about the trends in value-added process for in-molding. Does your company currently implement value-added processes? If so, which do you currently use? It seems like IML and IMD are becoming "hot buttons" in the industry, so are you currently implementing this technology, or have you thought about it? My company works with molders to provide labels for this technology, but I am surprised by the contrast of companies who use it and love it, and companies who have never heard of it or have no use for it. I know a lot of it depends on the parts being produced, but I'd like to hear what you think about this technology and other value-added processes. Thanks!

The market of IML/IMD have being come more and more interesting, to have the opportunity to develop new technologies is my first interest. Aco Mold is specialist in injection mold manufacturer, IMD (back injection with textile), it is our more important business.

IML/IMD has had a tough go in the U.S., unlike Europe where it's been quite popular for a decade +. Several issues: lack of label suppliers makes it difficult to collaborate -- most in Europe. The huge number of SKUs that OEMs have means that PS labels are more conducive to flexibility of containers, SKUs, etc. They don't want to get stuck with millions of bottles/containers with a label that is obsolete, etc. And the long supply chain that necessitates collaborative efforts among mold maker, molder, brand owner, automation supplier, label supplier to make it all happen. It's better -- growing somewhat -- but not there yet.
Clare Goldsberry

Sarah,

I wanted to incorporate this technology/advancement in the components manufactured for vehicles about 10 years ago. I noticed the use of this material at the Chicago Plastics show and believed it could work well in our applications but needed to be tested.

The industry currently uses labels on the top of power distribution boxes, electronics and so on. The other option is pad printing uses in Asian Brands for the most part.

It all comes down to chemical resistance and environmental stability and willingness of the automotive leaders to make the specification changes. I don't know if your product line has evolved enough to put the material in vehicle on a large scale but there is certainly opportunity.

Hope this information helps...

Excellent Video Juan...

What are the investments for the automation and how easy is it to re-configure for different production jobs?

What is the average cost of the label in this case?

Glyn makes a couple of good points: First, IML/IMD have to meet performance criteria to be useful, and second, getting manufacturers to change specs is a challenge.
IML/IMD technology has significantly advanced in the past few years. Digital printing has improved, allowing greater flexibility and personalization, like the work Vibrant Graphics is doing. Their customers can decorate their products with beautiful color images with variable print or personalization. On the durable side, we've introduced in-mold labels with resistance to harsh chemicals (isopropyl alcohol, gasoline, MEK, etc) and long-term fade resistance. We're in final testing of a material that will withstand exposure to sulfuric acid and 10+ years outdoor sunlight. So, the industry is evolving to develop products for nearly every application...
...Which will sit on a shelf somewhere unless manufacturers choose to use the products. So the big question is: What entices a manufacturer to switch to this new technology? Is it improved quality over post-mold decorating options? Labor savings by automating label application? The ability to enhance the appearance of the product through better graphics/personalization?